Fundamental Principles for Preparing Psychology Journal Articles Quiz Questions and Answers

How do you feel about the pressure to publish in academia?

  • “Publish or perish” is a real thing, and it’s incredibly stressful.
  • I thrive under pressure; bring on the deadlines and reviewers’ comments!
  • I’m more interested in the research itself than the publication game.

What’s your favorite part of writing a research paper?

  • Crafting a witty and engaging introduction.
  • Meticulously analyzing the data and presenting it in clear figures and tables.
  • Speculating wildly in the discussion section about the implications of my findings.

What makes you nervous about submitting a manuscript to a journal?

  • Getting a scathing rejection letter from the editor.
  • My research not being impactful enough to warrant publication.
  • The peer-review process feeling like a personal attack.

What makes you most frustrated about the current state of academic publishing?

  • The emphasis on quantity over quality.
  • The slow and often opaque peer-review process.
  • The exorbitant costs of publishing in some journals.

What are you most excited about when it comes to sharing your research with the world?

  • Making a real contribution to the field of psychology.
  • Seeing my name in print and adding a publication to my CV.
  • Inspiring future research and sparking debate among my peers.

What do you dream about when it comes to your academic career?

  • Winning a Nobel Prize for my groundbreaking research.
  • Becoming a renowned expert in my field and publishing a best-selling textbook.
  • Finding a research topic I’m passionate about and making a meaningful impact.

What happened in the past when you received your first rejection from an academic journal?

  • I was devastated but used the feedback to improve my manuscript and eventually get published.
  • I questioned my career choice and considered becoming a barista.
  • I shrugged it off, knowing that rejection is part of the process, and submitted it to another journal.

What comes to mind when you hear the phrase “publish or perish”?

  • The intense pressure to publish in academia to secure jobs and promotions.
  • A hilarious but sadly accurate description of academic life.
  • A reminder that research should be shared and disseminated to advance knowledge.

What’s your favorite academic writing tip?

  • Write every day, even if it’s just a paragraph.
  • Get feedback from trusted colleagues early and often.
  • Don’t be afraid to be bold and original in your thinking.

When you were a kid, how did you approach school assignments and projects?

  • I was a meticulous planner and always followed the rules.
  • I procrastinated until the last minute and then threw something together.
  • I was more interested in exploring my own ideas than meeting the assignment requirements.

You have a choice of writing a groundbreaking but controversial research paper or a safe and unoriginal paper that is guaranteed to be published. Which do you choose?

  • I’m going for groundbreaking! I’d rather make a splash, even if it ruffles some feathers.
  • I’ll play it safe. I need publications for my career, and I don’t want to risk rejection.
  • I’d find a way to make the controversial topic more palatable to reviewers without sacrificing its integrity.

A specific situation arises: You discover a significant error in your data analysis right before submitting your manuscript. How do you react?

  • Panic! I frantically try to fix the error, even if it means delaying submission.
  • Ignore it and hope the reviewers don’t notice.
  • I’m transparent about the error in my manuscript and discuss its potential impact on the findings.

What keeps you up at night about your research?

  • My data not supporting my hypothesis and my research being a complete flop.
  • Missing a crucial detail in the literature that invalidates my entire argument.
  • Ethical considerations and the potential impact of my research on participants or society.

Which of these activities related to academic publishing would you enjoy the most?

  • Presenting my research at a prestigious conference.
  • Having a lively debate with a colleague about my latest findings.
  • Receiving an acceptance letter from a top-tier journal.

When you think about the peer review process, what are you most concerned about?

  • Biased reviewers who are hostile to my research topic.
  • Receiving overly critical feedback that crushes my spirit.
  • The review process taking so long that my research is outdated by the time it’s published.

What aspect of academic writing makes you the most happy?

  • Crafting a well-argued and insightful piece that contributes to our understanding of the human mind.
  • Knowing that my work might have a real-world impact on people’s lives.
  • Receiving positive feedback from reviewers and seeing my work cited by other researchers.

What is most likely to make you feel down about your academic pursuits?

  • The competitive nature of academia and feeling like I’m constantly comparing myself to others.
  • The lack of job security and the difficulty of finding a permanent position.
  • The feeling that my research is insignificant and won’t make a real difference in the world.

In a perfect world, what would the academic publishing process be like?

  • A quick, transparent, and constructive process that focuses on improving the quality of research.
  • A system that values originality and risk-taking over safe and predictable research.
  • A collaborative environment where researchers work together to advance knowledge rather than compete for grants and publications.

If you could wave a magic wand, what would the perfect outcome be for your current research project?

  • My research would be published in a top-tier journal, win multiple awards, and inspire a whole new field of study.
  • My findings would lead to tangible benefits for people’s lives, such as new therapies or interventions.
  • I would gain the respect of my peers and mentors, knowing that I’ve made a valuable contribution to the field.

How often do you read academic journals for fun?

  • Never, I need a break from academia in my free time!
  • Occasionally, when I come across something particularly interesting.
  • I’m a research nerd and could spend all day browsing journals.

You are at a party, and someone asks what you do for a living. You mention you’re a psychology researcher. They ask about your research. What do you do?

  • I give them a brief and engaging overview of my research, highlighting its importance.
  • I launch into a long and overly detailed explanation, boring them to tears.
  • I try to change the subject; I don’t really feel like talking about work right now.

How comfortable are you with public speaking and presenting your research to a large audience?

  • I love it! It’s my chance to shine and share my passion with the world.
  • I get incredibly nervous, but I force myself to do it for the sake of my career.
  • I avoid it at all costs. I’d rather have my research speak for itself.

You have a one-year sabbatical to do whatever you want. What do you do?

  • I’m finally going to finish that book I’ve been working on for years.
  • I’m traveling the world and experiencing new cultures.
  • I’m using this time to focus on my research without the distractions of teaching and administrative duties.

Which of these issues is most likely to be a struggle for you as a researcher?

  • Imposter syndrome and feeling like I’m not smart enough to be in academia.
  • Maintaining a healthy work-life balance and avoiding burnout.
  • Dealing with rejection and criticism and staying motivated despite setbacks.

Which member of the research team are you?

  • The leader who comes up with the ideas and delegates tasks.
  • The detail-oriented one who makes sure everything is done correctly.
  • The creative one who thinks outside the box and comes up with innovative solutions.

New and groundbreaking research emerges that contradicts your own findings. What is your first response?

  • I’m excited to learn more and potentially adjust my own research direction.
  • I’m defensive and dismissive, trying to find flaws in the new research.
  • I’m a little apprehensive but ultimately open to revising my own understanding if the evidence is strong enough.

Someone asks, “How’s the research going?” What’s the actual answer, not just “Good”?

  • “It’s a rollercoaster! I’m grappling with some unexpected findings, but it’s exciting.”
  • “It’s a slow and painful process, but I’m making progress.”
  • “I’m at a bit of a standstill, to be honest. I’m feeling stuck.”

What’s your go-to way to de-stress after a long day of research?

  • Hitting the gym for a good workout.
  • Curling up with a good book and a cup of tea.
  • Catching up with friends and family and talking about anything but research.

What area of psychology do you most want to explore further?

  • The mysteries of consciousness and the human mind.
  • The complex interplay of nature and nurture in shaping who we are.
  • The development of new therapies and interventions to improve people’s lives.

What’s your favorite memory from your academic journey so far?

  • The moment I had my first research paper accepted for publication.
  • Presenting my research at a conference and receiving positive feedback from experts in my field.
  • The late-night study sessions with classmates that turned into lifelong friendships.

What research topics are you most passionate about?

  • Understanding the root causes of mental illness and developing more effective treatments.
  • Exploring the potential of the human mind and unlocking our full cognitive abilities.
  • Using psychological principles to address social issues such as prejudice, inequality, and climate change.

What is your absolute favorite thing about being a psychology researcher?

  • The thrill of discovery and the constant pursuit of knowledge.
  • The opportunity to make a real difference in the world through my work.
  • The intellectually stimulating and challenging nature of the field.

How would your friends and family describe your approach to research?

  • Passionate, dedicated, and maybe a little too obsessed at times.
  • Curious, thoughtful, and always asking questions.
  • Creative, unconventional, and not afraid to challenge the status quo.

Tell us a little about your writing style.

  • Clear, concise, and to the point. I like to get straight to the heart of the matter.
  • Engaging and accessible. I want my writing to be understandable even to those outside of academia.
  • I tend to be a bit verbose, but I’m working on being more concise.

If you could choose any superpower to help you with your research, what would it be and why?

  • Telekinesis, so I could move heavy lab equipment around without breaking a sweat.
  • Mind control, so I could get my participants to actually follow the instructions for once.
  • Time travel, so I could go back and collect more data or fix that one crucial error in my experiment.

What’s the first thing that comes to mind when you encounter a particularly challenging research problem?

  • “How can I break this down into smaller, more manageable questions?”
  • “Time to hit the books and see what the literature says.”
  • “I wonder if there’s a TED Talk about this…”

What affects you the most – positive feedback or negative feedback on your work?

  • Positive feedback motivates me, while negative feedback helps me grow.
  • I tend to dwell on negative feedback more than I should, even if it’s constructive.
  • I take all feedback with a grain of salt. It’s just one person’s opinion, after all.

What’s your idea of a perfect research collaboration?

  • Working with brilliant minds who challenge and inspire me.
  • Having clearly defined roles and responsibilities to avoid conflict.
  • A shared passion for the research topic and a commitment to achieving a common goal.

What is your strongest asset as a researcher?

  • My ability to think critically and analytically.
  • My creativity and ability to come up with innovative solutions.
  • My persistence and determination to see a project through to completion.

How prepared are you to face the challenges of the academic publishing process?

  • “Bring it on! I’ve got this.”
  • “I’m a little terrified, to be honest, but also strangely excited.”
  • “I’m going to need a lot of coffee and support from my colleagues.”

What happens if your manuscript gets rejected from your target journal?

  • I’ll revise it based on the feedback and submit it to another journal.
  • It depends on the feedback. I might decide to shelve the project altogether.
  • I’ll likely experience a brief existential crisis before dusting myself off and trying again.

What do you think you need to do to achieve your academic goals?

  • Publish high-quality research, network with influential people in my field, and never give up on my dreams.
  • Find a supportive mentor, collaborate with talented colleagues, and learn how to handle rejection gracefully.
  • Stay true to my research interests, maintain a healthy work-life balance, and avoid burning out.

How often do you set aside dedicated time for writing?

  • Every day, even if it’s just for an hour.
  • A couple of times a week, when I can manage it.
  • Whenever inspiration strikes, which is unfortunately not that often.

How confident are you in your ability to write a compelling and publishable research paper?

  • I believe in my research and my ability to communicate its importance effectively.
  • I have my moments of doubt, but I’m working on building my confidence.
  • I’m not sure if I have what it takes, but I’m willing to learn and grow.

How do you handle criticism of your work?

  • I try to be objective and see it as an opportunity for growth.
  • I get defensive and take it personally.
  • It depends on who’s giving the criticism and how it’s delivered.

Do you have a support system in place, such as a mentor, trusted colleagues, or friends and family who understand the demands of academic life?

  • Yes, I have a great network of people I can rely on.
  • I’m working on building stronger relationships with my colleagues.
  • I tend to isolate myself when I’m stressed, which I know isn’t healthy.

How well do you stick to your convictions when it comes to your research, even when faced with pressure to conform to current trends or please reviewers?

  • I’m guided by my research questions and the data, not by trends or external pressures.
  • It’s a constant struggle, but I’m learning to stand up for my ideas.
  • I tend to go with the flow, which can sometimes mean sacrificing my own research interests.

Which of the following is most accurate when it comes to your research process?

  • I’m organized, methodical, and always have a plan.
  • I’m more of a free spirit, and my best ideas come to me in unexpected ways.
  • I’m a work in progress, trying to find a system that works for me.

To what degree do you experience imposter syndrome in your academic life?

  • I rarely feel like an imposter. I’ve worked hard to get where I am.
  • It comes and goes, but I’m learning to manage it better.
  • I feel like a fraud most of the time, convinced that I’m going to be exposed as a fake.

Which of these best describes your current stage in the research process?

  • I’m in the data analysis phase, feeling overwhelmed by spreadsheets but excited about what I might find.
  • I’m struggling to write the introduction, feeling lost in a sea of literature.
  • I’m putting the finishing touches on my manuscript, feeling a mixture of relief and terror as I approach the submit button.

What is your current biggest challenge related to your research?

  • Securing funding to continue my work.
  • Finding the time to write amidst my other responsibilities.
  • Overcoming my fear of rejection and putting my work out there for the world to see.

What’s the first thing that comes to mind when you encounter a major obstacle in your research?

  • “What can I learn from this setback?”
  • “Who can I ask for help?”
  • “Maybe I should have gone to law school…”

How do you handle conflicting feedback from reviewers?

  • I carefully consider all perspectives and try to find a way to address the concerns raised.
  • I get frustrated and overwhelmed, unsure of whose feedback to prioritize.
  • I focus on the positive comments and ignore the rest.

How would you describe your relationship to the academic publishing process?

  • It’s a necessary evil on the road to sharing my research with the world.
  • It’s a challenging but ultimately rewarding aspect of academic life.
  • It’s a source of immense stress and anxiety that makes me question my career choices.

Are you stuck in a particular pattern or way of thinking that might be hindering your research progress?

  • I’m open to new ideas and approaches, constantly seeking ways to improve.
  • I can be set in my ways and resistant to change, even when it’s necessary.
  • I’m not sure. Maybe an outside perspective would be helpful.

What would you say are your top three struggles right now as you navigate the world of academic research?

  • Managing my time effectively, dealing with rejection, and maintaining a healthy work-life balance.
  • Staying motivated, overcoming imposter syndrome, and believing in my ability to make a meaningful contribution to my field.
  • Finding collaborators I connect with, securing funding for my research, and navigating the complexities of the academic job market.

What is your ultimate research goal?

  • To make a groundbreaking discovery that changes the way we think about a particular phenomenon.
  • To develop a new theory or model that explains human behavior in a novel and insightful way.
  • To conduct research that has a real-world impact, improving people’s lives in some tangible way.

What do you think is missing in your current approach to research that might help you achieve your goals more effectively?

  • I need to be more strategic in my networking and collaboration efforts.
  • I need to work on my self-promotion skills and learn how to share my work with a wider audience.
  • I need to prioritize my mental health and well-being and create a more sustainable work-life balance.

What is your current level of expertise in statistical analysis and research methodology?

  • I’m comfortable with most statistical techniques and confident in my ability to design and execute rigorous research.
  • I’m still learning and often have to consult with experts for help with more complex analyses.
  • Statistics are my nemesis. I avoid them at all costs, even if it means limiting the scope of my research.

Your research receives unexpected media attention, and you’re asked to give a live TV interview about your findings. How do you respond?

  • “I’m ready for my close-up! This is my chance to share my research with the world.”
  • “I’m equal parts terrified and excited. I’ll need a lot of coaching beforehand.”
  • “No way. I’m calling in sick. Someone else can handle the spotlight.”

What word best describes how you feel most often as a researcher: curious, overwhelmed, or determined?

  • I’m driven by curiosity and a thirst for knowledge.
  • “Overwhelmed” is my default state. There’s always so much to do and never enough time.
  • I’m fueled by determination and a refusal to give up on my research goals.

Which of the following do you notice yourself worrying about on a day-to-day basis?

  • Whether my research is significant enough to get published.
  • Whether I’m working hard enough and doing enough to succeed in academia.
  • Whether I’m on the right path and if this is truly what I want to be doing with my life.

How confident and prepared do you feel in your role as a researcher?

  • I feel confident in my abilities and excited about the challenges ahead.
  • It’s a constant learning process, but I’m slowly gaining confidence.
  • I have moments of both confidence and self-doubt. It’s a rollercoaster ride.

How well do you manage to balance your passion for research with the practical demands of academic life?

  • It’s a constant juggling act, but I’m learning to prioritize and set boundaries.
  • I tend to prioritize my research over everything else, which can lead to burnout.
  • I’m still figuring out how to find that elusive balance.

How connected do you feel to the broader research community?

  • I feel like an integral part of a vibrant and supportive community.
  • I’m working on building stronger connections with my colleagues and mentors.
  • I tend to feel isolated and disconnected, like I’m in this alone.

Which of the following is most likely to frustrate you in your academic pursuits?

  • Unconstructive criticism from reviewers.
  • A lack of funding for my research.
  • The competitive nature of academia and the pressure to publish or perish.

What is the trickiest part about writing a research paper?

  • Crafting a compelling narrative that engages the reader while accurately representing the data.
  • Finding the time to write amidst all of my other responsibilities.
  • Staying motivated and avoiding procrastination.

Do you struggle more with imposter syndrome or fear of failure?

  • Imposter syndrome is a constant companion, whispering doubts in my ear.
  • Fear of failure paralyzes me, preventing me from taking risks and putting myself out there.
  • I struggle with both, but I’m learning to manage them better.

Do you have a system in place, such as a planner, task manager, or accountability partner, to help you stay organized and on track with your research goals?

  • Yes, I’m a master of organization and have a system for everything.
  • I’m working on it, but organization doesn’t come naturally to me.
  • I prefer to go with the flow and let my intuition guide me.

How do you determine your research project’s objectives and timelines?

  • I set realistic goals and deadlines based on my available resources and time constraints.
  • I tend to be overly ambitious, setting myself up for disappointment and missed deadlines.
  • I prefer to be flexible and adapt my plans as needed.

Are your research assistants consistently delivering high-quality work?

  • Yes, I’m fortunate to have a talented and dedicated team.
  • It’s a mixed bag. I’m constantly trying to improve their training and supervision.
  • I’m doing everything myself because I don’t trust anyone else to do it right.

How do you manage the peer-review process for your own manuscripts?

  • I carefully consider all feedback, revise my manuscript accordingly, and engage in constructive dialogue with the editor and reviewers.
  • I get defensive and take criticism personally, making it difficult to objectively evaluate the feedback.
  • I outsource the emotional labor to my mentor or a trusted colleague, asking them to review the comments first before I see them.

Learn more

Jessmyn Solana

Jessmyn Solana is the Digital Marketing Manager of Interact, a place for creating beautiful and engaging quizzes that generate email leads. She is a marketing enthusiast and storyteller. Outside of Interact Jessmyn loves exploring new places, eating all the local foods, and spending time with her favorite people (especially her dog).

Make a quiz for your business with AI

Use our AI quiz maker to create a beautiful quiz for your brand in a minute.

Make a quiz - for free