Homer and Classical Philology Informative Summary


In his inaugural address at Basel University in 1869, a young Friedrich Nietzsche critiques the state of classical philology, lamenting its lack of focus and internal disagreements. He particularly challenges the field’s reliance on mechanical analysis of historical context to understand poets. Using the “Homeric question” as a case study, Nietzsche argues against the prevailing notion of “popular poetry” as the product of a collective spirit, instead asserting the crucial role of individual genius in shaping even epic works traditionally attributed to communal authorship.

Nietzsche posits that the “Homeric question” – centered on the authorship of the Iliad and Odyssey – is often misguided by seeking aesthetic perfection in the epics’ structure. He argues that their design is a later addition, separate from the original creative act. For Nietzsche, true artistry lies in the individual poet’s instinctive power, not in later attempts at systematic arrangement. He concludes by advocating for a philology informed by philosophical principles, capable of appreciating the individual genius that underpins even the most monumental cultural achievements.

Key Findings:

  • The concept of “popular poetry” is a flawed one. Nietzsche argues that all poetry, including epic poetry, originates from individual creativity, even if it subsequently undergoes transformations through oral tradition.
  • The “Homeric question” is not about finding a single, perfect author. Nietzsche suggests that focusing on the quest for a flawless “Homer” is a distraction. He argues that the Iliad and Odyssey were likely shaped by a primary poet, whose work was later woven together with other material.
  • Philology should be guided by philosophical principles. Nietzsche envisions a philology that moves beyond mechanical analysis and embraces broader perspectives to illuminate the individual brilliance behind great artistic achievements.


  • The Importance of Individual Genius: Nietzsche emphasizes that artistic creation, even in seemingly collective forms like epic poetry, ultimately stems from individual minds. This challenges readers to look beyond broad categorizations like “popular poetry” and appreciate the unique spark of individual creation.
  • The Fluidity of Texts: The lecture underscores how texts, especially those passed down orally, are not static but evolve over time, accumulating additions and reinterpretations. This highlights the dynamic relationship between artist, work, and subsequent tradition.
  • The Need for a Philosophical Philology: Nietzsche calls for a philology grounded in philosophical principles, moving beyond mere historical and linguistic analysis. This encourages readers to consider how broader philosophical perspectives can enrich our understanding of art and culture.

Historical Context:

Nietzsche delivered this lecture in 1869, a time when classical philology was undergoing significant transformation. The discovery of ancient texts and advancements in linguistic analysis had challenged traditional views of authorship and literary history. The “Homeric question,” which questioned the single authorship of the Iliad and the Odyssey, was a subject of intense debate among scholars at the time. Nietzsche’s lecture reflects these intellectual currents and offers a distinct perspective informed by his developing philosophical ideas.


  1. The name “Homer” was not always exclusively linked to the Iliad and the Odyssey. In ancient Greece, “Homer” was associated with epic poetry broadly, encompassing works like the Thebais and others within the epic cycle.
  2. Ancient Greeks themselves debated Homer’s authorship. The Alexandrian grammarians, considered the peak of ancient Greek literary study, were already grappling with inconsistencies within the Homeric epics and proposed theories about oral transmission and potential later additions.
  3. The concept of “Homer” as the ultimate poetic genius emerged later. The idea of Homer as the singular, flawless poet, responsible for the aesthetic brilliance of the Iliad and Odyssey, solidified later in history, particularly with the rise of Greek aesthetic sensibilities.
  4. The Iliad and the Odyssey exhibit structural inconsistencies. Nietzsche points out that the epics are not perfectly cohesive wholes but rather collections of episodes, suggesting a process of assembly over time.
  5. Oral tradition played a significant role in shaping epic poems. Before being written down, these poems were transmitted orally, leading to variations, additions, and potentially the incorporation of material from different poets.


  1. Classical Philology: The study of the languages, literature, history, and culture of ancient Greece and Rome.
  2. Homeric Question: The debate surrounding the authorship of the Iliad and the Odyssey, questioning whether they were the work of a single poet named Homer or a compilation of multiple oral traditions.
  3. Chorizontes: Ancient Greek scholars who believed that the Iliad and the Odyssey were composed by different authors.
  4. Cyclical Epics: A group of ancient Greek epic poems that narrated different episodes from the Trojan War cycle, often attributed to Homer in earlier periods.
  5. Popular Poetry: A term used (and challenged by Nietzsche) to describe poetry believed to originate from the collective spirit or traditions of a people, rather than from an individual author.
  6. Individual Poetry (Artistic Poetry): Poetry created by a named and recognized individual poet, typically contrasted with the notion of “popular poetry.”
  7. Oral Tradition: The practice of transmitting stories, poems, and cultural knowledge verbally from one generation to the next.
  8. Aesthetic Judgment: An evaluation of an object or work of art based on its beauty, artistic merit, and the emotional response it evokes.
  9. Punctum Salines: Latin for “salient point,” it refers to the essential or most striking characteristic of something.
  10. Didactic: Intended to teach, particularly in having moral instruction as an ulterior motive.


  1. The Legend of the Contest Between Homer and Hesiod: Nietzsche uses this traditional story to illustrate how the ancient Greeks viewed “Homer” as representing a type of epic poetry rather than a specific individual.
  2. Aristotle’s Admiration for Homer’s Design: Nietzsche cites Aristotle’s praise for the overall structure of the Iliad to demonstrate how later critics perceived a unified artistic vision in the epics, despite potential inconsistencies.
  3. Schiller’s Criticism of Philologists: Nietzsche mentions Schiller’s accusation that philologists “scattered Homer’s laurel crown” to highlight the perceived conflict between detailed analysis and appreciation for artistic unity.
  4. Goethe’s Struggle to Grasp Homer: Nietzsche notes Goethe’s difficulty in reconciling the perceived perfection of the Homeric epics with the elusive nature of their authorship.
  5. The Alexandrian Grammarians’ Theories: The work of these ancient scholars, who proposed ideas about Homer’s potential blindness, oral transmission, and the possibility of later additions to the epics, serves as an example of early attempts to address inconsistencies within the Homeric texts.


Nietzsche’s lecture provides a thought-provoking critique of 19th-century classical philology and its approach to authorship. Using the “Homeric question” as a springboard, he challenges the idea of “popular poetry” as a purely collective endeavor and underscores the indispensable role of individual genius in artistic creation. He suggests that the search for a flawless, singular “Homer” is less important than recognizing the complex process of creation, oral transmission, and later synthesis that likely shaped the Homeric epics. Ultimately, Nietzsche calls for a philology imbued with philosophical spirit, capable of appreciating the individual artistry that underpins even the most monumental cultural achievements. His insights remain relevant, encouraging us to look beyond simplistic categories and recognize the human creativity that shapes our understanding of art and history.

Learn more

What is the best quiz for you business?

Quizzes are super effective for lead generation and selling products. Find the best quiz for your business by answering a few questions.

Take the quiz