Marko Marulic: The Author of the Term "Psychology" Quiz Questions and Answers

How do you feel about the idea that the history of common terms, like “psychology,” is often more complex than we initially think?

It makes me realize how much we take for granted and how important it is to keep an open mind.
It’s fascinating! I love digging deeper into the origins of words and concepts.
It makes me a bit uneasy, like the ground is less stable than I thought.
I’m not sure how to feel. It’s interesting but doesn’t directly impact my life.

What’s your favorite aspect of historical research, especially when it uncovers forgotten figures like Marko Marulic?

The thrill of discovering hidden truths and challenging established narratives.
Learning about the lives and works of people from different times and cultures.
The meticulous process of examining evidence and piecing together the past.
I don’t have a favorite aspect, as I’m not that interested in history.

What makes you nervous about academic debates, like the one surrounding the origin of the term “psychology”?

The possibility of getting facts wrong or misinterpreting evidence.
The potential for these debates to become overly competitive and hostile.
The fact that there might not be a clear-cut answer, which can be frustrating.
I don’t get nervous about academic debates; they rarely impact me.

What makes you most frustrated about the way history is often presented, especially when figures like Marulic are overlooked?

It perpetuates a simplified and often Eurocentric view of the past.
It neglects the contributions of many cultures and individuals.
It can be discouraging for those who don’t see themselves represented.
I’m not really frustrated by it; I take history with a grain of salt.

What are you most excited about when you think about the potential for future discoveries in the field of history?

The possibility of unearthing more forgotten stories and perspectives.
The opportunity to rewrite and enrich our understanding of the past.
The chance to learn from history’s mistakes and create a better future.
I’m not particularly excited because history doesn’t usually spark my interest.

What do you dream about when it comes to preserving and sharing knowledge, especially about underappreciated figures like Marko Marulic?

Creating engaging and accessible resources for everyone to learn from.
Fostering a love of history and critical thinking in future generations.
Building bridges between cultures through shared historical understanding.
My dreams don’t usually revolve around history or knowledge preservation.

What happened in the past when you discovered that a widely accepted “fact” turned out to be incorrect or incomplete?

I felt a sense of excitement and curiosity to learn more about the real story.
I was a bit shaken but ultimately realized that knowledge is constantly evolving.
I felt frustrated that I had been misled but also empowered to dig deeper.
I probably didn’t think much of it, as everyone makes mistakes sometimes.

What comes to mind when you hear the term “humanist,” especially in the context of Marko Marulic and his era?

Someone who championed reason, learning, and the study of classical texts.
Someone who believed in the potential of human beings to achieve great things.
Someone who sought to understand the world and humanity’s place in it.
I’m not entirely sure what a humanist is, so nothing specific comes to mind.

What’s your favorite example of a historical discovery that challenged conventional wisdom, similar to the revelation about Marulic’s use of “psychology”?

The discovery of the Rosetta Stone, which unlocked the secrets of Egyptian hieroglyphs.
The unearthing of the Dead Sea Scrolls, which shed new light on early Judaism.
The finding of the tomb of King Tut, which captivated the world with its treasures.
I can’t think of a specific example, but I’m sure there are many!

When you were a kid, how did you learn about history? Did you enjoy it?

I loved reading historical fiction and watching documentaries; it brought the past alive.
I found history classes boring, but I enjoyed learning about specific events or people.
I appreciated history’s importance but didn’t feel a strong personal connection to it.
Honestly, I don’t remember much about learning history as a kid.

You have a choice of reading a biography about Marko Marulic or a detective novel. Which do you choose?

Definitely the Marulic biography! I’m fascinated by his story and impact.
I’m more in the mood for a detective novel; I love a good mystery.
I might skim the Marulic biography, but I prefer fiction to non-fiction.
Neither really appeals to me; I have other interests.

A specific historical inaccuracy is being widely shared on social media. How do you react?

I try to politely correct the misinformation, providing reliable sources.
I get frustrated but know I can’t change everyone’s mind.
I ignore it; it’s not worth the energy to engage in online arguments.
I probably don’t even notice, as I’m not that active on social media.

What keeps you up at night about the future of knowledge and scholarship, particularly in an era of misinformation?

The increasing difficulty in discerning truth from falsehood.
The potential for valuable knowledge to be lost or forgotten.
The erosion of trust in experts and institutions.
Honestly, I have other things that keep me up at night.

Which of these activities related to history would you enjoy the most?

Visiting a historical archive and examining original documents.
Attending a lecture by a renowned historian.
Participating in a historical reenactment.
I think I’d prefer to binge-watch a historical drama series.

When you think about the study of history, what are you most concerned about?

Ensuring that history is presented accurately and objectively.
Making history engaging and relevant for future generations.
Preserving cultural heritage and learning from the past.
I’m not particularly concerned about the study of history.

What aspect of Marko Marulic’s story makes you the most happy?

That his contributions to knowledge are finally being recognized.
That his story challenges us to reconsider what we think we know.
That his legacy continues to inspire scholars and researchers today.
I’m not sure I would use the word “happy,” but it’s a positive development.

What is most likely to make you feel down about the state of historical awareness today?

The prevalence of historical revisionism and denialism.
The lack of interest in history among younger generations.
The underfunding of historical research and preservation efforts.
I don’t usually feel down about things related to history.

In a perfect world, what would happen to ensure that figures like Marko Marulic are given their proper due?

Their stories would be integrated into mainstream historical narratives.
Their works would be translated and made accessible to a wider audience.
Their contributions to knowledge would be celebrated and honored.
Ideally, history would be a much bigger part of our collective consciousness.

If you could wave a magic wand, what would the perfect outcome of the debate surrounding the origin of the term “psychology” be?

A greater appreciation for Marulic’s contributions to intellectual history.
A more nuanced understanding of the evolution of key terms and concepts.
A renewed focus on historical accuracy and rigorous scholarship.
Honestly, I’d rather wave the wand and have everyone just get along.

How often do you actively seek out information about historical figures or events that are new to you?

Fairly often; I enjoy expanding my knowledge base and challenging my assumptions.
Occasionally; I come across interesting historical tidbits now and then.
Rarely; I tend to stick to my existing interests and areas of expertise.
Never; I find history to be a bit dry and irrelevant to my life.

You are at a party, and someone makes a comment dismissing the relevance of history. What do you do?

I engage them in a conversation, highlighting the importance of understanding the past.
I politely disagree but don’t want to start an argument at a party.
I roll my eyes internally but keep the peace.
I probably don’t even react; it’s not worth getting involved.

How comfortable are you admitting that you don’t know much about a particular historical figure or event?

Completely comfortable; everyone has gaps in their knowledge.
A little uncomfortable; I feel like I should know more than I do.
Very uncomfortable; I don’t like appearing uninformed.
I rarely feel the need to admit it, as I don’t usually discuss history.

You have a free afternoon to do whatever you want. Do you choose to spend it learning more about Marko Marulic and his era?

Absolutely! I’d love to delve into his life and work in more detail.
Maybe, if there’s an interesting documentary or podcast available.
Probably not; I’d rather relax and recharge with a good book or movie.
Definitely not; I have other things I’d much rather do with my time.

Which of these is most likely to be a struggle for you?

Accepting that some historical questions may never have definitive answers.
Remaining objective when studying emotionally charged historical events.
Staying focused on research tasks when there are so many fascinating tangents.
I don’t really struggle with these things because history isn’t a major focus for me.

Which member of a historical society are you?

The enthusiastic newcomer, eager to learn and contribute.
The quiet observer, content to absorb information and reflect.
The skeptical inquirer, always questioning assumptions and interpretations.
I wouldn’t be a member of a historical society; it’s not really my thing.

New information about Marko Marulic’s life and work is uncovered. What is your first response?

Excitement! I can’t wait to learn more and see how it changes our understanding.
Curiosity mixed with caution; I want to make sure the information is credible.
Mild interest; it’s good that we’re learning more, but it’s not earth-shattering.
Indifference; it doesn’t really impact me or change my view of the world.

Someone asks, “What’s new with you?” and you’ve recently been engrossed in learning about Marulic. What’s the actual answer?

“Oh, I’ve been diving deep into the life of Marko Marulic, a fascinating Croatian humanist…”
“Not much, just been reading some interesting stuff about the history of the word ‘psychology’…”
“The usual, why? What’s new with you?” (I’d rather not bore them with my newfound knowledge.)
“Just working, same old, same old.” (History wouldn’t even cross my mind as a conversation topic.)

What’s your go-to source for learning about history (books, documentaries, podcasts, etc.)?

I love in-depth biographies and historical non-fiction books.
I prefer engaging documentaries or historical drama series.
I enjoy listening to history podcasts on my commute or while exercising.
I don’t really have a go-to source for learning about history.

What historical period or figure do you most want to explore further?

The Renaissance, especially the lives of polymaths like Leonardo da Vinci.
Ancient Egypt, with its mysteries, pharaohs, and pyramids.
The American Civil War, a pivotal and complex period in US history.
Honestly, I can’t say that I have a burning desire to explore any specific historical period.

What’s your favorite memory related to learning something new and surprising about history?

That time I stumbled upon a captivating book about a little-known historical event.
Watching a thought-provoking documentary that completely changed my perspective.
Having a lively debate with friends or family about a controversial historical figure.
I don’t have a specific memory that stands out, but I’m sure it happens to everyone.

What historical inaccuracies or injustices are you most passionate about correcting?

The erasure or misrepresentation of marginalized communities in history books.
The glorification of war and violence without acknowledging the human cost.
The perpetuation of myths and stereotypes that fuel prejudice and discrimination.
I’m not passionate about correcting any particular historical inaccuracies.

What is your absolute favorite way to engage with history, whether it’s through books, museums, travel, or something else?

Visiting historical sites and imagining the people and events that transpired there.
Immersing myself in historical fiction that brings the past to life.
Engaging in thoughtful discussions about the lessons we can learn from history.
I prefer to engage with the present rather than dwelling on the past.

How would your friends and family describe your interest in history?

“They’re a total history buff, always teaching us something new!”
“They appreciate history but aren’t obsessed with it.”
“They tolerate my history ramblings but don’t share my enthusiasm.”
“History? That’s not really their thing.”

Tell us a little about your approach to learning new information, especially when it comes to historical topics.

I’m a critical thinker who carefully evaluates sources and perspectives.
I’m a curious learner who enjoys exploring different viewpoints.
I prefer straightforward explanations and concise summaries.
I learn best through hands-on experiences and visual aids.

If you could choose any historical era to travel back to, which one would you choose and why?

Ancient Greece, to witness the birth of democracy and philosophy.
Renaissance Italy, to experience the flourishing of art and culture.
The Roaring Twenties, a time of great social and cultural change.
I’m content living in the present; time travel doesn’t appeal to me.

What’s the first thing that comes to mind when you hear about a new historical discovery?

“I wonder what else is out there waiting to be found!”
“That’s interesting, but I’ll wait for more information before forming an opinion.”
“Good for them, but it doesn’t really impact my life.”
“Another day, another historical discovery. What’s for dinner?”

What affects you the most: the past, the present, or the future?

I strive to live in the present, but I’m mindful of the past and hopeful for the future.
The past has shaped who I am today, so it holds a certain power over me.
The future is full of possibilities, both exciting and daunting.
I’m focused on navigating the present; the past is gone, and the future is uncertain.

What’s your idea of a well-curated history museum?

One that tells diverse stories through engaging exhibits and interactive displays.
One that balances factual accuracy with thought-provoking interpretation.
One that sparks curiosity and encourages visitors to learn more on their own.
One that’s not too crowded and has a good gift shop.

What is your strongest personal quality when it comes to engaging with history and complex information?

My open-mindedness and willingness to consider different perspectives.
My critical thinking skills and ability to evaluate sources.
My empathy and ability to connect with people from the past.
I’m not sure “strongest” is the right word, but I’m always willing to learn.

How prepared are you to give a presentation on Marko Marulic and his contribution to the term “psychology”?

Not at all prepared; I’ve just started learning about him.
Somewhat prepared; I know the basics, but I’d need to do more research.
Fairly prepared; I could put together a decent presentation with some prep time.
Very prepared; I’ve delved deep into the topic and feel confident in my knowledge.

What happens if new evidence surfaces that challenges the claim that Marko Marulic was the first to use the term “psychology”?

I would be eager to learn more and see how it fits into the existing scholarship.
I would approach the new evidence with a healthy dose of skepticism.
I would be disappointed if it turned out that Marulic wasn’t the first, but I’d accept the updated information.
It wouldn’t really bother me; historical discoveries are always being made.

What do you think you need to deepen your understanding of Marko Marulic’s life and work?

More time to delve into his writings and the historical context.
Access to scholarly articles and resources beyond general overviews.
The opportunity to discuss his work with experts in the field.
I’m content with my current level of understanding.

How often do you actively question the information you encounter, especially when it comes to historical accounts?

Very often; I’m always looking for biases, inconsistencies, and alternative perspectives.
Fairly often; I try to be critical but don’t always have the time or energy.
Occasionally; certain topics or sources raise red flags more than others.
Rarely; I tend to trust that information from reputable sources is accurate.

How confident are you in your ability to identify credible sources of historical information?

Very confident; I can usually spot red flags and assess source bias.
Somewhat confident; I rely on trusted institutions and experts.
Not very confident; it can be hard to navigate the world of information overload.
I don’t really think about it; I assume most sources have been vetted for accuracy.

How do you handle encountering conflicting historical accounts or interpretations?

I try to consider all sides and form my own informed opinion.
I defer to experts and trust their judgment.
I find it frustrating and tend to avoid engaging with conflicting information.
It doesn’t bother me; history is open to interpretation.

Do you have a copy of “Psichiologia de ratione animae humanae” (or a desire to read it if it’s ever discovered)?

I would love to read it! I’m adding it to my list of books to search for.
I’m curious about it but not sure I’d read the whole thing.
I’m not particularly interested in reading a 15th-century treatise.
What is that?

How well do you stick to your convictions about historical interpretations, even when challenged?

I’m open to changing my mind if presented with compelling evidence.
I’m willing to listen to other viewpoints but rarely change my stance.
I get defensive when my views are challenged.
I avoid discussing history to prevent disagreements.

Which of the following is most accurate when it comes to your approach to learning?

I enjoy the process of discovery and digging deeper into subjects that fascinate me.
I prefer to focus on practical information that I can apply to my life.
I learn best in structured environments with clear objectives and deadlines.
I learn best through hands-on experiences and social interaction.

To what degree do you experience “imposter syndrome” when discussing historical topics?

Rarely; I acknowledge that I don’t know everything and that’s okay.
Sometimes; I worry about misspeaking or appearing less knowledgeable than others.
Often; I feel out of my depth when discussing history with those more knowledgeable.
I don’t experience imposter syndrome in this context; it’s not a major part of my life.

Which of these best describes your current level of engagement with history?

History is a lifelong passion that I actively cultivate.
History is an interest that I enjoy exploring in my free time.
History is a subject I appreciate but don’t actively seek out.
History is something I’d rather avoid unless absolutely necessary.

What is your current biggest challenge when it comes to engaging with historical information?

Finding the time and energy to delve into topics that interest me.
Filtering through the vast amount of information and identifying credible sources.
Overcoming my own biases and preconceived notions about the past.
I don’t face any significant challenges in this area.

What’s the first thing that comes to mind when you encounter a historical inaccuracy?

“I need to find out more and understand how this misconception came to be.”
“It’s a shame that this misinformation is being spread.”
“People should really double-check their facts before sharing.”
“Eh, it’s just history.”

How do you handle disagreements about historical interpretations?

I engage in respectful dialogue, focusing on evidence and reasoning.
I avoid conflict and try to steer the conversation to less controversial topics.
I get defensive and struggle to see other points of view.
It depends on who I’m disagreeing with and how important the issue is to me.

How would you describe your relationship to the past?

I see the past as a rich tapestry that informs the present and future.
I appreciate the past but don’t dwell on it.
I find the past to be more fascinating than the present.
I’d rather not think about the past; it’s gone, and we can’t change it.

Are you stuck in a cycle of only seeking out historical information that confirms your existing beliefs?

Not at all; I actively seek out diverse perspectives and challenge my assumptions.
I try to be open-minded but may unconsciously gravitate toward information that aligns with my views.
I haven’t thought about it much; I assume I’m objective in my information consumption.
I’m not sure, as I don’t engage with history enough to have formed strong opinions.

What would you say are your top struggles right now when it comes to learning and retaining information?

Staying focused in our age of distractions.
Effectively evaluating the credibility of online sources.
Finding the time and energy for in-depth learning amidst a busy schedule.
I don’t face significant struggles in this area.

What is your primary goal when it comes to learning, whether it’s about history or any other topic?

To become a more well-rounded and informed individual.
To satisfy my curiosity and expand my understanding of the world.
To gain knowledge or skills that will benefit me personally or professionally.
I don’t have a specific goal; I learn as I go.

What do you think is missing in your quest for knowledge?

More time and fewer distractions.
A mentor or community to guide my learning journey.
Access to high-quality resources and learning materials.
I’m content with my current resources and learning style.

What is your current level of expertise in identifying logical fallacies and biases in historical arguments?

Expert; I can easily spot inconsistencies and flawed reasoning.
Proficient; I’m familiar with common fallacies and biases.
Intermediate; I’m still learning about different types of fallacies.
Novice; I’m new to the concept of logical fallacies and biases.

You are presented with a historical conspiracy theory. How do you respond?

I approach it with healthy skepticism, seeking out evidence-based rebuttals.
I find conspiracy theories entertaining but don’t take them seriously.
I get drawn into the intrigue and enjoy exploring different possibilities.
I avoid them; they’re often based on misinformation and fear-mongering.

What descriptive word best captures your emotional response to uncovering historical inaccuracies?

Intrigued
Frustrated
Disappointed
Apathetic

Which of the following do you notice yourself worrying about on a day-to-day basis?

The preservation of cultural heritage and historical sites.
The spread of misinformation and its impact on society.
The lack of emphasis on history education.
I don’t tend to worry about these things on a daily basis.

How confident and informed do you feel in your understanding of the world?

I feel confident in my knowledge but always open to learning more.
I feel reasonably informed but acknowledge that I have blind spots.
I feel overwhelmed by the amount of information out there and unsure what to trust.
I focus on my immediate surroundings and don’t dwell on global issues.

How well do you think you balance your personal interests with the importance of staying informed about the world?

I strike a good balance; I make time for both.
I lean more toward pursuing my passions.
I struggle to find the time and energy to stay up-to-date.
I’m content with my current level of awareness.

How connected do you feel to the broader human story, spanning across time and cultures?

Deeply connected; I see myself as part of something much larger.
Somewhat connected; I recognize our shared humanity but focus on my immediate community.
Not very connected; I’m primarily concerned with my own life and experiences.
It depends on my mood; sometimes, I feel a strong connection, and other times, I don’t.

Which of the following is most likely to frustrate you in a conversation about history?

People dismissing history as irrelevant or boring.
People perpetuating historical inaccuracies or myths.
People using history to justify prejudice or discrimination.
It takes a lot to frustrate me, especially when it comes to casual conversations.

What is the trickiest part about staying informed about the world, especially given the constant influx of information?

Identifying credible sources and avoiding misinformation.
Finding the time and mental energy to engage with complex issues.
Staying objective and avoiding confirmation bias.
I don’t find it particularly tricky; I have my trusted sources.

Do you tend to gravitate toward historical accounts that celebrate human achievement or those that expose our capacity for cruelty and injustice?

I appreciate both; it’s essential to acknowledge the complexities of history.
I prefer uplifting stories of progress and triumph.
I’m drawn to stories of resilience and overcoming adversity.
I tend to avoid emotionally heavy historical accounts.

Do you have a system in place, such as a reading list or a podcast queue, for expanding your knowledge of history and other topics?

Yes, I have a curated list of resources that I regularly update.
I have a mental list, but it’s not very organized.
I rely on recommendations from friends or online algorithms.
I don’t have a system; I come across information organically.

How do you determine your personal learning objectives each month or year?

I set specific goals based on my interests and areas I want to improve.
I have a general idea but don’t follow a strict plan.
I learn as I go, letting my curiosity guide me.
I don’t typically set learning objectives for myself.

Are your intellectual curiosity and desire for knowledge consistently being satisfied?

Yes, I feel intellectually stimulated and engaged.
Mostly, but there’s always more to learn.
Sometimes, but I often feel too busy or overwhelmed.
Not really, but I’ve accepted that I can’t be an expert on everything.

How do you manage the emotional impact of learning about challenging or tragic historical events?

I allow myself to feel the emotions but also seek out stories of resilience and hope.
I try to remain detached and focus on the facts.
I avoid emotionally heavy topics as much as possible.
It depends on the event and how closely I relate to it.

Learn more