Narrative Summary of Attention and Reaction

Overview:

This article, published in 1893, explores the relationship between attention and reaction time. I investigate the idea that reactions are slower when attention is focused on the sense impression rather than the movement itself. I challenge the prevailing theory of the time, put forth by Wilhelm Wundt, by presenting my own research findings which show that attention’s direction may not significantly affect reaction time. I also provide insightful observations about the role of practice, individual differences in reaction time, and the complexities of human attention.

Main Parts:

Introduction: The article begins by outlining the theory proposed by Wundt regarding the difference between muscular (attention on movement) and sensorial (attention on sense impression) reactions. I discuss previous research by Lange, Martius, and Titchener, who also observed this difference.
Challenging Wundt’s Theory: I critique Wundt’s assumption that apperception is involved when attention is focused on the sense impression. I argue that in everyday life, attention is typically directed towards the goal rather than the movement itself.
Experimental Results: I present the results of my own experiments, conducted with myself and two other subjects, to test the impact of attention direction on reaction time. I found that the reaction times were similar regardless of whether the subject focused on the movement or the sense impression.
Conclusion: I conclude that the direction of attention may not have a universal impact on reaction time, and that the results observed by Lange may not be universally valid. I suggest that individual differences in reaction time and practice levels play a significant role in the observed outcomes.

View on Life:

Practice Makes Perfect: This article suggests that practice is essential for developing automatic responses and improving performance. The more practiced a movement becomes, the less conscious attention is required.
Individual Differences: The experiments demonstrate that individual differences play a crucial role in reaction times. Some individuals may have naturally quicker and more consistent reactions than others, influenced by factors such as age, experience, and mental abilities.
Attention as a Control Mechanism: While challenging the specific theory of apperception, I still acknowledge the importance of attention in controlling and directing our actions. The article highlights the complexity of human attention and its potential impact on both movement and perception.

Scenarios:

Piano Playing: The author uses the example of piano playing to illustrate how attention shifts from the movement of fingers to the music being played as skill develops.
Everyday Life: The article mentions various activities such as speaking, writing, and playing games, all demonstrating that attention is often directed towards the goal rather than the movement itself.

Challenges:

Measuring Apperception: The author acknowledges the challenge of measuring the time taken for apperception to occur, as it is a subjective experience.
Consistent Results: The author faced the challenge of obtaining consistent results in his experiments, potentially due to factors such as individual differences and varying levels of practice among subjects.

Conflict:

Theorists vs. Experimental Findings: The main conflict presented is the difference between the theoretical framework proposed by Wundt and the experimental results observed by the author.

Plot:

The article presents a classic case of scientific inquiry, where the author challenges existing theory based on his own research findings.
The plot revolves around the author’s attempt to understand the relationship between attention and reaction time, leading to the development of his own perspective on the subject.

Point of View:

The article is written from a first-person perspective, as the author directly shares his own experiments and observations.
This point of view allows the reader to understand the author’s thought process and the specific challenges he faced during his research.

How It’s Written:

The author uses a clear and concise style, presenting his arguments logically and systematically.
He employs examples from everyday life to illustrate his points, making the concepts more relatable to the reader.
Example: “In the practiced automatic movements of daily life attention is directed to the sense impression and not to the movement. So, in piano playing, the beginner may attend to his fingers, but the practiced player attends only to the notes or to the melody.”

Tone:

The tone of the article is objective and scholarly, reflecting the scientific approach to the subject.
The author presents his arguments respectfully, even when disagreeing with the prevailing theory of the time.

Life Choices:

Commitment to Research: The author’s decision to conduct his own experiments and challenge existing theory demonstrates his commitment to scientific inquiry and the pursuit of knowledge.
Methodical Approach: The author’s use of careful experimental design and analysis reflects his thoughtful approach to research, highlighting the importance of rigorous methods for obtaining reliable findings.

Lessons:

Questioning Assumptions: The article encourages readers to question existing theories and assumptions, and to critically evaluate information before accepting it as truth.
Importance of Practice: The author’s research emphasizes the power of practice in shaping our abilities and influencing our performance.
Understanding Individual Differences: The article highlights the importance of acknowledging and understanding individual differences, as they can significantly impact our responses and behaviors.

Characters:

James McKeen Cattell: The author himself, a prominent psychologist who challenged the prevailing theory of the time and conducted his own research to support his conclusions.
Wilhelm Wundt: A prominent psychologist who proposed the theory that attention directed towards the sense impression leads to longer reaction times.
Subjects J and D: The two participants in Cattell’s experiment, who provided valuable data that contributed to his findings.

Themes:

Scientific Inquiry: The article emphasizes the importance of scientific inquiry, experimentation, and critical thinking in advancing our understanding of the world.
Attention and Perception: The article explores the complex interplay between attention and perception, and how our focus can influence our experiences and actions.
Human Performance: The article highlights the factors that contribute to human performance, including practice, individual differences, and the role of attention.

Principles:

Empirical Evidence: The article emphasizes the importance of empirical evidence and experimental data in supporting or refuting theoretical claims.
Scientific Method: The article demonstrates the application of the scientific method, involving observation, hypothesis formation, experimentation, and analysis.

Intentions of the Characters:

Cattell: To challenge the prevailing theory of the time and advance a different understanding of the relationship between attention and reaction time.
Wundt: To develop a comprehensive theory of human psychology, including the role of attention and its impact on mental processes.

Unique Vocabulary:

Apperception: The process of becoming aware of sensory information and its meaning.
Sensori-motor reaction: A type of reaction involving both sensory perception and motor action.
Mean Variation: A statistical measure of the spread of data points around the average.

Anecdotes:

Piano Playing: The anecdote about the piano player illustrates how attention shifts from the movement itself to the goal of playing music as skill develops.
The Beginner vs. The Expert: This anecdote highlights the importance of practice in developing automaticity and reducing the need for conscious attention.

Ideas:

The Complexity of Attention: The article proposes that attention is not a simple binary choice between focusing on the movement or the sense impression, but rather a complex interplay of factors.
The Importance of Individual Differences: The article emphasizes the importance of considering individual differences when interpreting experimental results and understanding human behavior.

Facts and Findings:

Cattell’s Research: The author presents his own findings, which show that reaction times are similar regardless of whether the subject focuses on the movement or the sense impression.
Previous Research: The article references previous research by Lange, Martius, and Titchener, who also observed differences in reaction time based on the direction of attention.

Statistics:

Mean Variation: The author uses mean variation to quantify the consistency of reactions across trials, demonstrating a higher level of consistency in the sensorial reactions.

Points of View:

First-Person Perspective: The article is written from the first-person perspective, allowing the reader to understand the author’s thought process and the specific challenges he faced during his research.
Objective Approach: Despite the first-person perspective, the article maintains an objective tone, presenting the facts and arguments in a clear and unbiased manner.

Perspective:

Scientific Perspective: The article provides a scientific perspective on the relationship between attention and reaction time, drawing on experimental data and analysis.
Empirical Approach: The article emphasizes the importance of an empirical approach to understanding human psychology, relying on observations and experiments to validate theories.

Learn more