Narrative Summary of The Behavioristic Interpretation of Consciousness

Overview:

This text argues for a behavioristic interpretation of consciousness, rejecting the dualistic view that mind is separate from matter. The author, K. S. Lashley, challenges the traditional understanding of consciousness by dissecting its supposed attributes and showing how they can be explained through the lens of physical science and the workings of the body. He argues that consciousness is not a separate realm but a complex integration of bodily activities, particularly those related to speech and gestures.

Main Parts:

Part I: The author criticizes different forms of behaviorism, rejecting methodological behaviorism as intolerant and strict behaviorism as incomplete. He argues for a behaviorism that can account for all phenomena, including the supposed data of introspection. The author then analyzes the supposed attributes of consciousness, such as awareness, content, and organization, showing how they can be understood in terms of physical processes and relationships.
Part II: The author further develops his argument by suggesting a hypothetical conscious machine whose activities mirror the characteristics of consciousness as defined by introspection. He shows how the machine’s reactions fulfill the subjective criteria for sensory quality, self-transcendence, and other supposed attributes of mind. This allows him to argue that consciousness is not a unique mode of existence but an emergent property of complex physical organization.
Part III: The author examines vitalistic arguments, which claim that certain biological phenomena are inexplicable in mechanistic terms. He refutes these arguments by pointing out that science is constantly expanding its explanatory power, and that assuming the impossibility of a mechanistic explanation is premature.
Part IV: The author clarifies his position by rejecting the two-aspect doctrine, which claims that there are two separate aspects to reality: mental and physical. He argues that behaviorism provides a more complete account of the same data that introspection describes, offering a more accurate and detailed understanding.
Part V: The author addresses the argument that consciousness is ineffable and beyond verbal characterization, suggesting that this claim is based on faith rather than empirical evidence. If consciousness is truly ineffable, then a subjective science of consciousness is impossible, making the behavioristic account as valid as any other.
Part VI: The author questions the existence of a reliable subjective criterion for consciousness, arguing that introspection only describes content and cannot definitively determine whether a state is conscious or not. He argues that objective psychology provides an equally valid criterion by describing the complexity of systems of behavior.
Part VII: The author presents his main argument, defining consciousness as a complex integration and succession of bodily activities, particularly those involving speech and gestures. He argues that consciousness is not a separate realm but an emergent property of complex physical organization.
Part VIII: The author criticizes the confusion of scientific explanation and humanistic valuation in psychology, arguing that a true science of behavior must be free from anthropocentric values and mystical obscurantism. He highlights the importance of separating scientific description from emotional interpretation.
Part IX: The author proposes a behaviorist program that focuses on the study of human conduct and the mechanisms underlying it. He calls for a shift in emphasis from introspective analysis to a focus on physiological mechanisms and social behavior. He acknowledges the need for a more comprehensive and widely understood behavioristic terminology.

View on Life:

Lashley advocates for a materialistic worldview, viewing consciousness as a complex product of physical processes. This perspective emphasizes the importance of understanding human behavior through the lens of biology and physiology.
Lashley criticizes the anthropocentric perspective that views humans as distinct from the rest of the natural world and argues for a more objective and scientific approach to studying human behavior.

Scenarios:

The author analyzes different arguments against behaviorism, including the supposed ineffability of consciousness, the two-aspect doctrine, and the argument from vitalism.
He explores the hypothetical conscious machine to demonstrate how a complex physical system can exhibit the qualities typically associated with consciousness.
He examines the process of problem-solving as an example of complex integration of bodily activities.

Challenges:

The author faces the challenge of explaining consciousness without resorting to subjective or metaphysical concepts.
He confronts the difficulty of developing a behavioristic psychology when the dominant field is still steeped in introspection and dualism.

Conflict:

The main conflict in the text is between behaviorism and psychophysical dualism.
The author refutes the claims of dualists by showing how the supposed attributes of consciousness can be explained in terms of physical mechanisms.

Plot:

The text follows a logical and systematic approach, dissecting the arguments for dualism and then offering a behavioristic explanation.
The author begins by defining the attributes of consciousness according to the subjective perspective and then introduces his theory of consciousness as a complex physical organization.
The hypothetical conscious machine serves as a crucial example and helps solidify the argument for a behavioristic interpretation.

Point of View:

The text is written from a first-person perspective.
The author presents a clear and concise argument for behaviorism, engaging directly with the opposing viewpoints and addressing their claims.

How It’s Written:

The text is written in a formal and academic tone.
It is highly analytical and argumentative, relying heavily on logic and evidence to support its claims.
The author uses precise language and technical terminology, demonstrating a deep understanding of the subject matter.
Example: “The machine will say, ‘I see a red light.’ If next we stimulate it with wave-length = 5200 Å., a different series of reactions will occur, also involving summation, and the machine will say, ‘I see a green light.'” This example illustrates the author’s clear and concise style, demonstrating how complex physiological reactions can lead to conscious experience.

Tone:

The text is persuasive and confident in its assertions, seeking to convince the reader of the validity of behaviorism.

Life Choices:

The author argues against the choice of assuming a separate realm of mind, suggesting that this choice is based on metaphysical beliefs rather than empirical evidence.
He advocates for a different approach to understanding human behavior, one that prioritizes physiology and physical mechanisms.

Lessons:

The text underscores the importance of scientific inquiry and objectivity in understanding the nature of consciousness.
It teaches us to question assumptions and look for more comprehensive explanations for complex phenomena.
It encourages readers to approach the study of human behavior with a critical and analytical mindset.

Characters:

K. S. Lashley: The author and protagonist of the text. He is a staunch advocate for behaviorism, a skilled analyst, and a keen observer of the human condition.
The reader: Implied as an audience who is grappling with the questions of consciousness and behavior.

Themes:

The nature of consciousness: Exploring the fundamental question of what consciousness is and how it arises.
The mind-body problem: Debating the relationship between mind and matter and exploring the implications of each perspective for understanding human behavior.
The importance of scientific inquiry: Emphasizing the need for objective observation and experimentation to understand complex phenomena.
The limitations of introspection: Illustrating the challenges of using introspection as the primary method for studying consciousness.
The power of physiological explanation: Advocating for the use of physiological mechanisms to account for the phenomena of consciousness and behavior.

Principles:

The principles of physical science are applicable to the study of consciousness.
Consciousness is not a separate realm but a complex integration of bodily activities.
Human behavior can be understood through the lens of physiology and the study of mechanisms.
Scientific inquiry and objectivity are essential for understanding the human condition.

Intentions of the Characters:

Lashley seeks to challenge the dominant view of consciousness and promote a behavioristic approach to psychology.
The reader’s intention is to gain a deeper understanding of consciousness and the different perspectives on its nature.

Unique Vocabulary:

Dominant system: Refers to the complex integration of bodily activities that are most closely related to speech and gestures.
Set: Describes a predisposition to react in a certain way, influenced by past experiences and current circumstances.
Verbo-gestural coördination: Emphasizes the close relationship between language and physical movement in shaping consciousness.

Anecdotes:

The hypothetical conscious machine serves as a key story illustrating how a complex physical system can exhibit the qualities typically associated with consciousness.
The neurological problem of frontal lobe damage and its relationship to attention is used to demonstrate the conflict and resolution processes within a conscious system.

Ideas:

The author proposes a radical new way of understanding consciousness, challenging the traditional dualistic view.
He argues that consciousness is not a separate realm of experience but a complex integration of bodily activities.
He suggests that a scientific study of behavior should focus on physiological mechanisms and social interactions.

Facts and Findings:

The text doesn’t include specific facts or findings in the sense of experimental data.
It relies on theoretical analysis and philosophical argumentation to support its claims.

Points of View:

The text is written from a behavioristic point of view, advocating for a materialistic and mechanistic approach to understanding consciousness and behavior.

Perspective:

Lashley’s perspective is one of scientific objectivity and a rejection of subjective interpretations.
He argues for a more comprehensive and inclusive view of psychology that encompasses the full range of human behavior, not just the conscious aspects.

Learn more