Narrative Summary of The Woman Problem

Overview: 

The article “The Woman Problem” by Edwin G. Boring investigates the underrepresentation of women in high-level positions within the field of psychology and beyond. It uses statistics to show that women are significantly less represented in prestigious positions compared to men, despite their numbers and qualifications. Boring analyzes this issue through the lens of societal dynamics, drawing parallels to the “Great Man” problem and the “Youth Problem”. He argues that the attainment of prestige is not a simple function of merit but also involves factors like timing, promotion, and the inertia of established ideas. He then analyzes the “standard operating procedure” for achieving prestige in psychology, including obtaining a PhD, conducting research, publishing, and eventually seeking administrative roles. He argues that this path might not be as accessible to women due to societal expectations and limitations.

Main Parts:

1. The Problem: The article opens with the stark reality of women’s underrepresentation in professional settings, particularly in leadership roles, using statistics from the American Psychological Association (APA) and other organizations.
2. The Great Man and Youth Problems: Boring draws a connection to the “Great Man” problem, questioning the role of individual genius in scientific progress and highlighting the impact of social dynamics on the recognition of achievements. He also connects this to the “Youth Problem,” observing that prestige often favors younger individuals in their prime while older established figures may find their influence fading.
3. The Standard Operating Procedure: The article then lays out a typical trajectory for gaining prestige in psychology, emphasizing the importance of research, publication, and administrative roles.
4. The Impact of Society: Boring argues that societal expectations and limitations contribute significantly to the “Woman Problem,” with women often facing obstacles in acquiring administrative positions.
5. The Role of Marriage: The article discusses the role of marriage and family responsibilities in further limiting women’s professional advancement, particularly their ability to dedicate full-time energy to their careers.
6. The Solution: Despite acknowledging societal barriers, Boring ultimately suggests that women should aim for success through writing and publishing books, aiming for public recognition through broader intellectual contributions rather than vying for administrative positions.

View on Life: The article implicitly presents a couple of distinct views on life:

1. Traditionalist View: The article reflects a traditional view of societal roles where men are more naturally suited for leadership and women prioritize family responsibilities. This is evident in the discussion of marriage and the expectations placed on women regarding domestic duties.
2. Meritocratic View: However, the article also recognizes the importance of merit and individual talent. While acknowledging societal obstacles, Boring emphasizes that intelligence and abilities are essential for success regardless of gender.

Scenarios:

1. The Lack of Women in Leadership: The article describes the common scenario of women being underrepresented in leadership positions across various professional organizations.
2. The Clash of Family and Career: The article highlights the scenario where women who choose to prioritize family may face difficulties achieving the same level of professional success as men who can dedicate more time to their careers.
3. The “Great Man” and “Youth” Dynamics: The article describes the scenarios where achievements are often credited to specific individuals, neglecting the contributions of others and favoring younger individuals in their prime.

Challenges:

1. Societal Barriers: The biggest challenge faced by women in the article is the societal barriers that limit their access to prestigious positions and opportunities for recognition.
2. The Conflict of Family and Career: The article depicts the challenge of balancing family responsibilities with career aspirations, a particularly challenging hurdle for women.
3. The “Standard Operating Procedure” and Its Limitations: The article highlights the difficulty women face in following the traditional path to professional success, which often involves sacrificing personal time and prioritizing career advancement above other aspects of life.

Conflict: The main conflict in the article is the disparity between women’s qualifications and their representation in high-level positions. This conflict arises from the interplay of societal expectations, the pursuit of professional success, and the limitations of the “standard operating procedure” for achieving prestige. This conflict is not directly resolved but rather acknowledged as an ongoing problem with potential solutions suggested.

Plot: The article doesn’t follow a traditional narrative plot but rather presents an analysis of a complex issue, the “Woman Problem.” Key milestones include:

1. The Problem is Introduced: Boring starts by establishing the problem through statistics and observations.
2. Comparison to Other Problems: He then connects it to other societal issues like the “Great Man” and “Youth” problems, analyzing the influence of social dynamics on how we perceive and recognize achievements.
3. Analysis of the “Standard Operating Procedure”: The article then explores the usual path to professional success in psychology, highlighting the factors involved in acquiring prestige.
4. Impact of Society on Women: Boring identifies societal expectations and limitations as significant barriers for women seeking to achieve professional recognition.
5. The Role of Marriage: He examines the impact of marriage and family responsibilities on women’s career paths.
6. Potential Solutions: Finally, he offers a potential solution, urging women to focus on achieving recognition through writing and publishing books.

Point of View: The text is primarily written from the point of view of a male psychologist who observes and analyzes the “Woman Problem” through the lens of societal dynamics and his understanding of the professional landscape. This perspective provides insights into the challenges and limitations faced by women in the field, but it also reflects a certain level of traditional thinking.

How It’s Written: The article is written in a formal academic style, using a tone of objectivity and analysis. It utilizes statistical evidence, examples, and historical comparisons to support its arguments. The writing style is clear, concise, and informative, relying on factual statements and reasoned arguments.

Tone: The overall tone of the article is analytical and objective. Boring attempts to understand the “Woman Problem” through a factual, almost detached perspective, using statistics and observation to present a nuanced analysis of the issue.

Life Choices: The article suggests that women are often forced to make difficult choices between pursuing full-time career advancement and prioritizing family responsibilities. This choice is presented as a direct consequence of the societal limitations and expectations placed upon women.

Lessons: The article offers valuable lessons about:

1. Social Dynamics: The article highlights the importance of understanding societal dynamics and the influence of social constructs on individuals’ experiences and opportunities.
2. Limitations of the “Standard Operating Procedure”: The article suggests that the traditional path to professional success might not be equitable for everyone and that alternative pathways need to be considered.
3. The Importance of Merit: While recognizing societal barriers, the article also emphasizes the importance of individual merit and talent as crucial factors in achieving professional recognition.

Characters: The primary character in the article is Edwin G. Boring himself, a renowned psychologist who uses his expertise to analyze the “Woman Problem.” Other characters mentioned include:

1. Dr. Mildred B. Mitchell: A female psychologist who brought attention to the underrepresentation of women in the APA, providing the impetus for Boring’s analysis.
2. Harvey Lehman: A researcher who studied the correlation between age and productivity in various fields, which Boring uses to support his analysis of the “Youth Problem.”
3. “The 168-hour people”: An allegorical character representing individuals with extreme job-concentration, often associated with male professionals.
4. Carl Rogers: A prominent clinical psychologist who became president of the APA through his influential book on a general theory of therapy.
5. Walter Dill Scott: A pioneer in applied psychology who gained recognition through administrative success in personnel testing during World War I.

Themes: Important themes in the article include:

1. Gender Inequality: The article addresses the systemic gender inequality present in the professional world and its impact on women’s opportunities for recognition and advancement.
2. The Pursuit of Prestige: The article explores the nature of prestige and how it is acquired, highlighting the various factors involved beyond individual merit.
3. The Balancing Act: The article examines the challenges of balancing family responsibilities with career aspirations, particularly for women who face societal expectations that prioritize domestic duties.
4. The Limits of the Traditional Model: The article critiques the traditional model of professional success, highlighting its limitations and its potential for perpetuating inequality.

Principles: The article implicitly presents a few fundamental principles:

1. Societal Norms and Expectations: The article highlights the powerful influence of societal norms and expectations on individuals’ experiences and opportunities.
2. The Need for Meritocratic Systems: While acknowledging the impact of social dynamics, the article ultimately calls for meritocratic systems that value individual talent and abilities.
3. The Importance of Challenging Traditional Models: The article suggests the need to challenge traditional models of success and consider alternative pathways for achieving recognition and advancement.

Intentions: The author, Edwin G. Boring, aims to raise awareness about the underrepresentation of women in psychology and provide a nuanced analysis of the factors contributing to this disparity. He invites the reader to consider the complexity of the issue, acknowledge the role of societal dynamics, and potentially explore alternative pathways to professional success.

Unique Vocabulary: The article uses specific terms that reflect its historical context, such as:

1. “Woman Problem”: This term underscores the societal perception of women’s underrepresentation as a problem to be addressed.
2. “Great Man Problem”: This refers to the overemphasis on individual genius in scientific progress and its potential to obscure the contributions of others.
3. “Youth Problem”: This describes the tendency for prestige to favor younger individuals, potentially leading to a decline in recognition for older established figures.
4. “Job-concentration”: This term highlights the importance of dedicated focus and effort in achieving professional success.

Anecdotes:

1. The Success of Carl Rogers and Walter Dill Scott: The article mentions the success stories of Carl Rogers and Walter Dill Scott as examples of men who gained recognition through writing and administrative roles, respectively. These anecdotes demonstrate the typical paths to professional success as described in the article.
2. The “Society of ExperimentING Psychologists”: This anecdote highlights the cultural tendency to favor younger individuals in their prime. The article mentions a proposal to establish a society for younger psychologists, highlighting the desire to create a space for new talent without the limitations of established prestige.

Ideas: The article puts forth several key ideas:

1. The “Woman Problem” is Rooted in Social Dynamics: The article argues that the underrepresentation of women in professional settings is not solely due to prejudice but rather a product of complex societal dynamics that influence opportunities and recognition.
2. The Path to Prestige is Complex: The article emphasizes that prestige is not simply earned through merit but also involves factors like timing, promotion, and the inertia of established ideas.
3. Women Need to Redefine Success: The article suggests that women seeking professional success need to consider alternative pathways beyond the traditional model, focusing on broader contributions through writing and public intellectual engagement.

Facts and Findings: The article presents several statistics and facts:

1. Low Representation of Women in the APA: The article cites statistics showing the low number of women presidents of the APA and the overall underrepresentation of women in leadership roles.
2. Underrepresentation of Women in Scientific Societies: The article highlights the significantly lower numbers of women members in prestigious organizations like the National Academy of Sciences and the American Philosophical Society.
3. Age and Productivity: The article cites research by Harvey Lehman indicating that men often make their most significant contributions to knowledge between the ages of 30-45.

Statistics: Specific statistics mentioned in the article include:

1. Two Women Presidents in APA History: The article notes that out of 59 presidents, only two women have held the position.
2. 8% Women in “American Men of Science”: The article highlights the significantly low representation of women in this directory of prominent scientists.
3. Less Than 6% of Starred Psychologists: The article indicates that fewer than 6% of the psychologists designated with a star in the first seven editions of “American Men of Science” were women.
4. 3 Women Members in National Academy of Sciences: The article reports that out of 461 members, only 3 were women.
5. 8 Women Members in American Philosophical Society: The article highlights that only 8 women were members of this society out of 486.

Points of View: The article is primarily written from the point of view of a male psychologist, reflecting his understanding of the professional landscape and societal norms. This perspective offers insights into the challenges faced by women but also reveals a certain level of traditional thinking.

Perspective: The article provides a historical perspective on the “Woman Problem” in the 1950s, highlighting the societal norms and expectations prevalent at the time. It sheds light on the limitations faced by women in pursuing professional success and offers a glimpse into the cultural context of the time.

Learn more