The Game of Logic (2003) Informative Summary

Overview: Lewis Carroll’s “The Game of Logic” provides a unique and playful introduction to the fundamentals of symbolic logic. Using a system of diagrams and colored counters, Carroll breaks down complex logical concepts into manageable steps. The book focuses on representing different types of propositions, identifying their subjects and predicates, and understanding how to combine them to form valid syllogisms.

Through various examples and exercises, Carroll explains the difference between particular and universal propositions, explores the use of middle terms in syllogistic reasoning, and highlights common fallacies in argument construction. The text emphasizes the importance of logical thinking in everyday life, suggesting that mastering these principles can help individuals analyze arguments more effectively and avoid common pitfalls in reasoning.

Key Findings:

  • Symbolic Representation: Logic can be visualized and manipulated using diagrams and symbols, making abstract concepts more concrete.
  • Proposition Types: Propositions can be classified as particular (referring to some members of a class) or universal (referring to all members of a class).
  • Syllogistic Reasoning: Valid conclusions can be derived from a pair of propositions (premises) that share a common term.
  • Fallacy Detection: Logic helps to identify flawed arguments, both in terms of their premises and their conclusions.


  • Understanding Propositions: Readers will learn to identify the subject and predicate of a proposition and distinguish between particular and universal propositions. This knowledge is fundamental to analyzing the basic building blocks of logical arguments.
  • Constructing Syllogisms: Readers will gain the ability to construct and analyze syllogisms, understanding the role of the middle term in connecting premises to reach a conclusion. This skill is crucial for evaluating the validity of deductive reasoning.
  • Identifying Fallacies: Readers will be equipped to recognize common logical fallacies, such as fallacious premises and fallacious conclusions. This awareness is essential for critical thinking and avoiding deceptive arguments in everyday life.
  • Applying Logic: The book encourages readers to apply logical principles beyond the game itself, recognizing the relevance of logic in various aspects of life, from personal decision-making to political discourse.

Historical Context: Published in 2003 as an ebook, this edition of “The Game of Logic” provides access to Carroll’s work for a modern audience. Though originally published in the 19th century, the principles of logic it presents remain timeless and applicable to contemporary reasoning.


  1. Attributes are properties of things: Attributes are characteristics or qualities that can be ascribed to things. Examples include “red,” “sweet,” “heavy,” or “intelligent.”
  2. Things cannot be attributes: A thing, such as a cat, cannot be an attribute, such as “furry.” Attributes are used to describe things, not the other way around.
  3. Propositions are statements about classes: A proposition asserts a relationship between two classes of things, indicating whether some, none, or all members of one class belong to another. For example, “All dogs are mammals” states that the entire class of dogs belongs to the class of mammals.
  4. Particular propositions refer to some: A particular proposition claims that at least one member of a class has a certain attribute. “Some cats are black” means at least one cat possesses the attribute “black.”
  5. Universal propositions refer to all: A universal proposition applies to all members of a class. “All squares have four sides” asserts that every member of the class “square” possesses the attribute “having four sides.”
  6. “Some” means one or more: In logic, “some” doesn’t specify a precise quantity, but it means at least one, possibly more.
  7. An individual proposition is about a single thing: An individual proposition makes a claim about a specific, individual entity. For example, “Socrates is a philosopher” refers to a single individual.
  8. Existence is assumed in some propositions: Propositions that begin with “some” or “all” assume the existence of the things they are referring to. “All unicorns have horns” implies that unicorns exist, even though they are mythical creatures.
  9. Syllogisms involve three terms: A syllogism consists of two premises and a conclusion, all of which involve three terms. Two of these terms are linked by a third term, called the middle term.
  10. The middle term is eliminated in the conclusion: The conclusion of a syllogism connects the two terms that were not directly linked in the premises, removing the middle term.
  11. Negative propositions are easier to mark: In Carroll’s diagrammatic system, negative propositions (starting with “no”) can be directly represented with grey counters, indicating emptiness in specific compartments.
  12. Logic is concerned with the validity of arguments: Logic focuses on whether the conclusion of an argument follows logically from the premises, regardless of the truth or falsity of the premises themselves.
  13. Fallacious premises lead to no conclusion: When the premises of an argument are fallacious, they do not provide sufficient information to draw any valid conclusion.
  14. A fallacious conclusion doesn’t follow from the premises: A fallacious conclusion is a statement that does not logically result from the given premises, even if the premises themselves are true.
  15. A defective conclusion is partially correct: A defective conclusion may capture some part of the correct conclusion but does not encompass the full logical implications of the premises.
  16. Not all fallacies are always fallacious: Some arguments labeled as fallacies in traditional logic might be valid in a broader system that allows for different types of propositions.
  17. Attributes can be re-arranged in some cases: In propositions starting with “some” or “no,” attributes within the terms can be rearranged without changing the logical meaning of the proposition.
  18. “All x are y” implies “Some x are y”: The universal proposition “All x are y” includes the particular proposition “Some x are y” as part of its meaning.
  19. “No x are y” is stronger than “No x are y'”: The proposition “No x are y” asserts a stronger claim than “No x are y'” because it rules out any possibility of x and y coexisting.
  20. Logic can be applied to various contexts: The principles of logic are not limited to academic exercises but can be used to analyze arguments in various domains, including philosophy, science, law, and everyday conversations.

Statistics: The text does not contain any specific statistics.


  1. Attribute: A characteristic or quality that can be ascribed to a thing.
  2. Proposition: A statement that asserts a relationship between two classes of things.
  3. Term: A word or phrase that refers to a class of things in a proposition.
  4. Subject: The class of things that a proposition is about.
  5. Predicate: The class of things that the proposition asserts something about the subject.
  6. Particular Proposition: A proposition that refers to some members of a class.
  7. Universal Proposition: A proposition that refers to all members of a class.
  8. Syllogism: A logical argument consisting of two premises and a conclusion, all involving three terms.
  9. Middle Term: The term that appears in both premises of a syllogism and connects the other two terms.
  10. Fallacy: A flawed argument, either in terms of its premises or its conclusion.


  1. “Some new cakes are nice”: This is a particular proposition, asserting that at least one new cake possesses the attribute “nice.”
  2. “All dogs are mammals”: This is a universal proposition, claiming that every dog belongs to the class of mammals.
  3. “No cats are dogs”: This is a negative proposition, stating that no cat can also be a dog.
  4. “Socrates is a philosopher”: This is an individual proposition, focusing on a specific individual, Socrates.
  5. “All men are mortal; Socrates is a man; therefore, Socrates is mortal”: This is a classic syllogism, demonstrating deductive reasoning.
  6. “All birds can fly; penguins are birds; therefore, penguins can fly”: This is an example of a fallacious syllogism because the first premise is false (not all birds can fly).
  7. “Some politicians are honest; some honest people are trustworthy; therefore, some politicians are trustworthy”: This is another fallacious syllogism because the conclusion doesn’t logically follow from the premises. The middle term “honest people” doesn’t guarantee a link between “politicians” and “trustworthy.”
  8. “All students study hard; John is a student; therefore, John studies hard”: This is a valid syllogism, but the conclusion might be defective if John is a lazy student.
  9. “I am hungry; hungry people eat; therefore, I will eat”: This is a syllogism based on personal experience.
  10. “No dragons exist; all mythical creatures are fascinating; therefore, dragons are fascinating”: This syllogism highlights the distinction between logical validity and factual truth. The conclusion follows logically, but the first premise is likely false.

Conclusion: “The Game of Logic” offers an entertaining and accessible way to grasp the core principles of symbolic logic. By using diagrams and counters, readers can visualize the relationships between propositions and test the validity of syllogisms. The book emphasizes the practical value of logical thinking, equipping readers with tools to analyze arguments effectively and avoid common reasoning errors. Whether used as a playful introduction to logic or a refresher on its fundamental concepts, “The Game of Logic” provides valuable insights into the structure of arguments and the importance of critical thinking.

Learn more

What is the best quiz for you business?

Quizzes are super effective for lead generation and selling products. Find the best quiz for your business by answering a few questions.

Take the quiz